Ashok Vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Indore Bench) 18 Dec 2023 Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 55691 Of 2023 (2023) 12 MP CK 0078
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 55691 Of 2023

Hon'ble Bench

Prakash Chandra Gupta, J

Advocates

Vikas Yadav, Viraj Godha

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 437(3), 439
  • Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 8, 15, 29

Judgement Text

Translate:

Prakash Chandra Gupta, J

1. Heard with the aid of case diary.

This is first application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking bail by the applicant/accused, relating to FIR/Crime No.647/2023 dated (not

mentioned) registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Mandsaur (M.P.) for commission of offence punishable under Sections 8/15 and 29 of the

NDPS Act.

2. Prosecution story, in brief is that on 02.12.2023, co-accused Mahesh Vishnoi was found in possession of 25 kgs. of Poppy Straw, without having

any license or authority. During investigation, it was found that co-accused Ishwarlal Balai had supplied the aforesaid contraband to co-accused

Mahesh Vishnoi. Thereafter, co-accused Ishwarlal Balai was arrested, who in his memorandum statement has named the present applicant Ashok

Rawat and Rahul Balai, who had supplied him the aforesaid contraband.

3 . Learned counsel for the applicant/accused person submits that the applicant has not committed the offence and he has falsely been implicated in

the case only on the basis of memorandum statement given by co-accused Ishwarlal Balai. No contraband has been seized from the possession of

present applicant. There is no legal evidence available against him. Applicant has no criminal past and is in custody since 04.12.2023. After completion

of investigation, charge-sheet has been filed. Trial will take considerable long time for its disposal, therefore, it is prayed that the applicant be released

on bail.

4 . On the other hand, learned counsel for the non-applicant/State has opposed the prayer and prayed for rejection of the application.

5. Having considered the rival submissions and after perusal of the case diary so also looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

of the view that applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail, hence, without commenting on the merits of the case, the application is allowed.

6. It is directed that applicant- Ashok Rawat shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lac

only) with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court, for his appearance before the

concerned Court regularly on all such dates as may be fixed in this regard during trial. It is further directed that applicant shall comply with the

provisions of Section 437 (3) of Cr. P. C.

7. This order shall be effective till the end of trial but in case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.

8. With the aforesaid, this application is allowed and stand disposed of. Certified copy, as per Rules.

From The Blog
CBDT Cracks Down on Bogus Deduction Claims: Taxpayers to Get SMS and Email Alerts
Dec
16
2025

Court News

CBDT Cracks Down on Bogus Deduction Claims: Taxpayers to Get SMS and Email Alerts
Read More
Gujarat High Court: Myopic Reading of Sections 129 & 130 of CGST Act Would Create Hostility
Dec
16
2025

Court News

Gujarat High Court: Myopic Reading of Sections 129 & 130 of CGST Act Would Create Hostility
Read More