Rakesh Vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala 26 Dec 2023 Bail Application No. 10724 Of 2023 (2023) 12 KL CK 0245
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Bail Application No. 10724 Of 2023

Hon'ble Bench

P.G. Ajithkumar, J

Advocates

Santhosh Kumar V.P., Sajeevan Kurukkuttiyullathil, Vishnu Prabhakar V.S., Akshay Shylesh, Adwaitha Udayan, Sumodh M., Rekha S

Final Decision

Dismissed

Acts Referred
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 307, 364A, 395, 511

Judgement Text

Translate:

P.G. Ajithkumar, J

1. This is an application for bail filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2. The petitioner is the 4th accused in Crime No.1534 of 2023 of Perumbavoor Police Station. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 511

of 364A and 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. The prosecution allegation is on 07.10.2023 at about 3.00 pm, the petitioner along with the remaining accused forcibly attempted to abduct the

defacto complainant by taking him in a car and threatened him with the intention of extorting money. It is further alleged that the applicants and other

accused obtained Rs.1 lakh from him and forcibly got executed a sale letter of Innova Car of the defacto complainant in favour of the accused No.1.

5. The petitioner would contend that he did not involve in the alleged crime and without any material or evidence, he has been implicated in the crime.

He is innocent. The investigation in the matter has been progressed considerably and there is no reason or justification for his further detention.

6. The Sub Inspector of Police, Perumbavoor Police Station has submitted a report, through the learned Public Prosecutor, objecting the grant of bail

to the petitioner.

7. Going by the allegations in the First Information statement and also the materials available on record, the role of the petitioner is to aid the first

accused in getting the sale note executed. It is true that the petitioner has involved in another crime involviing an offence under Section 307 of the IPC

which is pending trial. Accused Nos.1, 2 5 and 6 have already been granted bail by this Court. The petitioner has been in custody since 10.10.2023.

The investigation is at its fag end.

8. Considering the aforesaid aspects, I am of the view that the further detention of the petitioner is unnecessary and the petitioner is entitled to be

released on bail subject to conidtions.

In the result, the bail application is allowed and the petitioner is granted bail on his executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only), with

two solvent sureties for the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate, subject to the following conditions:

(i) He shall not influence or intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence;

(ii) He shall appear before the investigating officer as and when called for; and

(iii) During the bail period, he shall not get involved in any offence.

In case of breach of the bail conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to apply for cancellation of the bail before the jurisdictional court.

From The Blog
CBDT Cracks Down on Bogus Deduction Claims: Taxpayers to Get SMS and Email Alerts
Dec
16
2025

Court News

CBDT Cracks Down on Bogus Deduction Claims: Taxpayers to Get SMS and Email Alerts
Read More
Gujarat High Court: Myopic Reading of Sections 129 & 130 of CGST Act Would Create Hostility
Dec
16
2025

Court News

Gujarat High Court: Myopic Reading of Sections 129 & 130 of CGST Act Would Create Hostility
Read More