Dr. Prerna Singh Vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court 15 Jan 2024 Writ Petition (S/B) No. 34 Of 2024 (2024) 01 UK CK 0087
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (S/B) No. 34 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

Alok Kumar Verma, J

Advocates

Rohit Dhyani, P.C. Bisht

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred
  • Constitution Of India, 1950 - Article 226

Judgement Text

Translate:

Alok Kumar Verma, J

1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers:-

“(I). Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus quashing the letter dated 25.11.2023(Annexure No. 6) & letter dated

08/12/2023(Annexure No. 7) & letter dated 02/01/2024, (Annexure No. 8) and further directing the Respondent no 1 to 3 to accept the resignation

letter and to relieve the petitioner from the post of Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali Institute of Medical

Science & Research, Srinagar, Pauri Garhwal.

(II). Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no 4, to transfer of Aadhar Enabled Biometric

System (AEBAS ID) from the previous organization to the current organization i.e Graphic Era Institute of Medical Sciences.

(III). Issue any suitable writ, order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper on the basis of the facts and circumstances of the

case.â€​

2. Heard Mr. Rohit Dhyani, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.C. Bisht, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the State.

3. Mr. Rohit Dhyani, Advocate, has requested to decide the present writ petition directing the Competent Authority to accept the resignation letter of

the petitioner. He further submitted that the petitioner will submit her fresh resignation letter before the Competent Authority within ten days’ from

today.

4. Mr. P.C. Bisht, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the State seeks three weeks’ time to decide the petitioner’s resignation letter.

5. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of by directing the Competent Authority that if the petitioner

submits her resignation letter before him within ten days’ from today, then he will take a decision on her resignation letter by a speaking order,

expeditiously, preferably within a period of three weeks from the day of submission of the resignation letter.

6. Needless to say that the Competent Authority shall consider the petitioner’s resignation letter in accordance with the relevant rules.

7. It is also clarified here that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

From The Blog
Tamil Nadu Ex-Minister K. Ponnusamy Haunted by Old Debt Defaults in Corruption Case
Dec
04
2025

Court News

Tamil Nadu Ex-Minister K. Ponnusamy Haunted by Old Debt Defaults in Corruption Case
Read More
Supreme Court of India Warns: Police and Courts Must Avoid Criminal Charges in Civil Disputes
Dec
04
2025

Court News

Supreme Court of India Warns: Police and Courts Must Avoid Criminal Charges in Civil Disputes
Read More