Jeevan Singh Vs Dharma Ram And Others

Rajasthan High Court 12 Feb 2024 Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3441 Of 2011 (2024) 02 RAJ CK 0033
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3441 Of 2011

Hon'ble Bench

Rekha Borana, J

Advocates

T.R. Singh Sodha, Jagdish Vyas

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred
  • Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5

Judgement Text

Translate:

Rekha Borana, J

1. The appeal is reported to be barred by 154 days. An application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been filed for condonation of delay.

2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay caused in filing the present appeal is condoned.

3. The present appeal has been preferred on behalf of the owner of the vehicle in question against the judgment/award dated 06.01.2009 vide which

while awarding compensation in favour of the claimants, the Insurance Company was held entitled to ""Pay and Recover"". The said finding was arrived

at by the learned Tribunal on the ground that driver of the vehicle possessed a license for a light motor vehicle (LMV) and hence, was not entitled to

drive a heavy motor vehicle (HMV). The vehicle in question was a transport vehicle and hence, the learned Tribunal held that the Insurance-Company

though would be liable to pay compensation but would be entitled to recover the same from the owner of the vehicle.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the driver possessing a license qua light motor vehicle can also drive a light transport vehicle as held

by Hon’ble the Apex Court in Mukund Dewangan vs. Oriental Insurance Company Limited, (2017) 14 SCC 663.

5. Learned counsel for the respondent-Insurance Company is not in a position to refute the above settled legal position, however, he submits that

correctness of the judgment in Mukund Dewangan's case (supra) is pending consideration before the Hon'ble Constitution Bench. But the Constitution

Bench has observed that till the issue is decided by it, the ratio as laid down in Mukund Dewangan's case (supra) would hold the field.

6. In view of the above, the present appeal is allowed. The direction as issued by the learned Tribunal to the Insurance-Company to ""Pay and

Recover"" is hereby set aside. The impugned judgment and award dated 06.01.2009 is modified to that extent.

The Insurance Company would be liable to pay the compensation and would not be entitled to recover the same from the owner/driver of the vehicle.

7. Stay petition also stands disposed of.

From The Blog
NCLT Bar Slams ED Searches at Lawyers’ Homes in Alleged Undervalued Land Sale Probe
Dec
09
2025

Court News

NCLT Bar Slams ED Searches at Lawyers’ Homes in Alleged Undervalued Land Sale Probe
Read More
PMAY ₹222 Crore Fraud: ED to Chargesheet Ocean Seven Buildtech MD Swaraj Singh for Cheating Homebuyers
Dec
09
2025

Court News

PMAY ₹222 Crore Fraud: ED to Chargesheet Ocean Seven Buildtech MD Swaraj Singh for Cheating Homebuyers
Read More