Police Commissioner And Others Vs Commissioner Of Central Excise & ST, Surat-I And Others

Customs, Excise And Service Tax Appellate, Ahmedabad 15 Feb 2024 Service Tax Appeal No. 13637 Of 2014, 10515 Of 2015, Service Tax Cross No. 10162 Of 2015 (2024) 02 CESTAT CK 0024
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Service Tax Appeal No. 13637 Of 2014, 10515 Of 2015, Service Tax Cross No. 10162 Of 2015

Hon'ble Bench

Ramesh Nair, Member (J); C.L. Mahar, Member (T)

Advocates

Rahul Gajera, Rajesh Nathan

Final Decision

Dismissed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Ramesh Nair, Member (J)

1. The issue involved is that the service of security escort/ detecting agency provided by the Police Commissioner, Surat and consideration received their against is liable to service tax or otherwise. Against the common order assessee the police Commissioner filed Appeal No ST/10515/2015 contesting the demand of service tax. Revenue also filed Appeal No. ST/13637/2014 seeking imposition of penalty which was not imposed by the adjudicating authority. Since the Revenue appeal is consequential to the demand of service tax, assessee’s appeal is taken first for consideration.

2. Shri Rahul Gajera, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee submits that the issue of levy of service tax on the police department for various service such as escort service, detecting agency service provided to various agencies and consideration received here against is not liable to service tax as held in various following judgments:-

(a) Deputy Commissioner of Police Jodhpur vs. Commissioner – 2017 (48) STR 275 –(Tri. Del) upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court reported at Commissioner vs. Deputy Commissioner – 2018 (11) GSTL J133 (SC)

(b) Jamnagar Police vs. CCE and ST, Rajkot - 2023 (12) TMI 183-

3. Shri Rajesh Nathan, Learned Assistant Commissioner (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the finding of the impugned order.

4. We have carefully considered the submission made by both sides and perused the records. We find that the issue is no longer res-integra as in the various judgments including the judgments cited by the assessee, it is categorically held that security service provided by the police department to various agencies and consideration their against received by them is not liable to service tax under security agency service. Therefore, the issue is no longer res-integra. Therefore, the demand is set aside, consequently no penalty can be imposed as sought in the Revenue’s appeal.

5. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside. Appeal of Assessee is allowed and appeal of revenue is dismissed. CO also stands disposed of.

From The Blog
CBDT Cracks Down on Bogus Deduction Claims: Taxpayers to Get SMS and Email Alerts
Dec
16
2025

Court News

CBDT Cracks Down on Bogus Deduction Claims: Taxpayers to Get SMS and Email Alerts
Read More
Gujarat High Court: Myopic Reading of Sections 129 & 130 of CGST Act Would Create Hostility
Dec
16
2025

Court News

Gujarat High Court: Myopic Reading of Sections 129 & 130 of CGST Act Would Create Hostility
Read More