Chhotu @ Chhotelal And Others Vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Gwalior Bench) 2 Apr 2024 Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 12830 Of 2024 (2024) 04 MP CK 0012
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 12830 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

Sunita Yadav, J

Advocates

Sooraj Bhan Lodhi, Girraj Soni

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 379, 511

Judgement Text

Translate:

Sunita Yadav, J

This is the first application filed by the applicants under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail relating to FIR No.40 of 2024 registered at Police

Station Karera, District Shivpuri (M.P.) for the offence under Sections 379 and 511 of IPC.

Learned counsel for the applicants argued that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated. FIR is lodged against unknown persons

and applicants have been arrayed only on account of his own memorandum. It is further argued that applicants are in custody since 24.1.2024. After

conclusion of investigation, charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no requirement of further custodial interrogation of the applicants.

Offence is triable by JMFC and trial is likely to take long time to conclude. Further argument is that applicants are the permanent residents of District

Shivpuri (M.P.) and there is no possibility of their absconsion or tampering with the prosecution evidence, if released on bail. Hence, he prays for grant

of bail to the applicants.

Per contra, learned counsel for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and prayed for its dismissal.

Heard learned counsel for the rival parties and perused the case diary available on record.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is

directed that the applicants be released on bail on each of them furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000 (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only)

with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/committal Court.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicants:-

1) The applicants will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by them;

2) The applicants will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

3 ) The applicants will not indulge themselves in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to

dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4) The applicants shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which they are accused. In case offence of same nature is repeated, this bail

order shall automatically stand cancelled;

5) The applicants will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and

6 ) The applicants will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

Learned State counsel is directed to send an e-copy of this order to the Station House Officer of the concerned Police Station for information and

necessary action.

E- copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance, if possible, by the office of this Court.

Certified copy as per rules.

From The Blog
J&K High Court: Dealer and Manufacturer Jointly Liable for Car Defects Reported Within Warranty Period
Dec
08
2025

Court News

J&K High Court: Dealer and Manufacturer Jointly Liable for Car Defects Reported Within Warranty Period
Read More
ITAT Ahmedabad: Assessment Order Invalid Without DVO Report, Property Valuation Additions Quashed
Dec
08
2025

Court News

ITAT Ahmedabad: Assessment Order Invalid Without DVO Report, Property Valuation Additions Quashed
Read More