Viram Lal Balotiya Vs Arif Mohammad Pathan And Others

Rajasthan High Court 1 Feb 2024 Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 415 Of 2023 (2024) 02 RAJ CK 0157
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 415 Of 2023

Hon'ble Bench

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

Advocates

Ajay Kumar Vyas, Aidan Choudhary, Dinesh Deora, NS Shekhawat

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482

Judgement Text

Translate:

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

Instant cr. Misc. application has been filed by the complainant/applicant for recalling of the order dated 17.03.2023, passed by this Court in SB Cr.

Misc. Petition No.406/2023 whereby the misc. petition was allowed and the impugned FIR lodged against the accused-respondents was quashed

solely on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.

Counsel for the complainant/applicant submits that during the pendency of the misc. petition, compromise was arrived at between the

complainant/applicant and accused-respondent No.1 Arif Mohd. Pathan, but the accused-respondent No.1 failed to comply with the terms and

conditions of the compromise. Therefore, it is prayed that the order dated 17.03.2023 may be recalled and Police be directed to re-commence

investigation in the FIR impugned.

Per contra, learned counsel for accused-respondents No.3 & 4 submits that no specific role has been assigned to accused-respondent Nos.3 & 4. It is

further submitted that a written compromise was executed between the complainant/applicant and accused-respondent No.1 Arif Mohd. Pathan and

accused-respondents No.3 & 4 have nothing to do with the alleged crime. Therefore, it is prayed that the present misc. application for recalling the

order dated 17.03.2023 may be dismissed.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the misc. application.

The criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was allowed by this Court solely on the basis of compromise arrived at between the

complainant/applicant and respondent No.1 Arif Mohd. Pathan. Now, the complainant/applicant himself submits that the accused-respondent No.1 has

violated the terms and conditions of the compromise. In such circumstances, this Court deems it proper to recall the order dated 17.03.2023 passed in

SB Cr. Misc. Petition No.406/2023.

Hence, the Cr. Misc. application is allowed. The order dated 17.03.2023, passed by this Court in SB Cr. Misc. Petition No.406/2023 is hereby

recalled. The Police is directed to re-commence investigation in the FIR impugned.

From The Blog
BookMyShow Wins Major Tax Relief: CESTAT Rules It Only Facilitates Ticketing, Not Trading
Dec
05
2025

Court News

BookMyShow Wins Major Tax Relief: CESTAT Rules It Only Facilitates Ticketing, Not Trading
Read More
Income Tax Department Cracks Down on Third-Party Credit Card Payments: Notices Issued Across India
Dec
05
2025

Court News

Income Tax Department Cracks Down on Third-Party Credit Card Payments: Notices Issued Across India
Read More