Hamid Ali Vs Union Of India & Ors.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Bench, Allahabad 29 Jul 2024 Original Application No. 330, 85 Of 2018 (2024) 07 CAT CK 0036
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Original Application No. 330, 85 Of 2018

Hon'ble Bench

Rajiv Joshi, Member (J)

Advocates

Tanay Srivastav, Vijay Kumar Singh

Final Decision

Dismissed

Acts Referred
  • Central Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1987 - Rule 15(1)

Judgement Text

Translate:

Rajiv Joshi, Member (J)

1. List has been revised, but nobody appears on behalf of the applicant to place the matter. Shri Vijay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the

respondents is present.

2. Under the circumstances, the Court has no option, but to dismiss instant case for want of prosecution as per Rule 15 (1) of Central Administrative

Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1987. Accordingly, instant Original Application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

4. Pending M.A., if any, will be treated as disposed of.

From The Blog
J&K High Court: Dealer and Manufacturer Jointly Liable for Car Defects Reported Within Warranty Period
Dec
08
2025

Court News

J&K High Court: Dealer and Manufacturer Jointly Liable for Car Defects Reported Within Warranty Period
Read More
ITAT Ahmedabad: Assessment Order Invalid Without DVO Report, Property Valuation Additions Quashed
Dec
08
2025

Court News

ITAT Ahmedabad: Assessment Order Invalid Without DVO Report, Property Valuation Additions Quashed
Read More