Piyush Kumar And Others Vs District Magistrate Haridwar & Another

Uttarakhand High Court 26 Jul 2024 Special Appeal No. 228 Of 2024 (2024) 07 UK CK 0147
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Special Appeal No. 228 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

Ritu Bahri, CJ; Rakesh Thapliyal, J

Advocates

Arvind Vashistha, Hemant Singh Mahra, Amarendra Pratap Singh, Chandra Shekhar, Harshit Sanwal

Final Decision

Dismissed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Ritu Bahri, CJ

1) Heard learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants.

2) The only question for consideration in the present appeal is that a factually incorrect fact had been recorded by the learned Single Judge that

Narendra Singh had got compensation of all the shareholders. However, counsel for the appellants states that factually the appellants had got

proportionate share of compensation to which they were the owners.

3) Learned Senior Counsel for the appellants seeks and is allowed to withdraw the present appeal to make an application for correction / modification

in the order passed by the learned Single Judge by moving appropriate application, and this Court is further observing that even the NHAI will file its

supplementary affidavit clarifying this fact.

4) In view of the above, the special appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

5) Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

From The Blog
Rajasthan High Court Raps Axis Bank for Encashing FD Without Court Permission, Orders Refund
Dec
12
2025

Court News

Rajasthan High Court Raps Axis Bank for Encashing FD Without Court Permission, Orders Refund
Read More
FEMA Compliance for NRI Family Trusts: Legal Clarity on Corpus, Beneficiaries, and Repatriation
Dec
12
2025

Court News

FEMA Compliance for NRI Family Trusts: Legal Clarity on Corpus, Beneficiaries, and Repatriation
Read More