Binod Kumar Singh, Vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court 30 Jul 2024 Writ Petition (Cr.) No. 698 Of 2023 (2024) 07 JH CK 0109
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (Cr.) No. 698 Of 2023

Hon'ble Bench

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J

Advocates

Mahesh Kumar Sinha, Neha Pandey

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred
  • Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Section 21(A4)

Judgement Text

Translate:

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J

1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State.

2. The prayer in the writ petition is made for quashing of the order dated 21.07.2023 in Confiscation Case No.19/2022 whereby the direction has been

issued for confiscation of the vehicle being Registration No. JH-09R-6362.

3. Mr. Mahesh Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that Barwadda P.S. Case No.84 of 2022 was registered alleging

therein that the said truck was carrying coal on the ground that the valid challan was not produced with regard to the coal. He submits that the said

vehicle and the coal has been released in favour of the petitioner by order of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad, however now the

impugned order has been passed by the Deputy Commissioner on the strength of Rule 11(V) of Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining

Transportation and Storage) 2017. He submits that the said Rule has already been declared ultra vires by the Division Bench of this Court by order

dated 02.07.2024 passed in W.P. (C) No.6788 of 2023.

4. Further, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that as per mandate of Section 21(4-A) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and

Regulation) Act, 1957, the appropriate authority is the Court, who has taken cognizance of the offence. The Deputy Commissioner or Collector has no

power to confiscate the vehicle in question and this issue has already been settled by this Court vide order dated 13.09.2023 passed in W.P. (Cr.)

No.502 of 2023 and vide order dated 29.11.2023 passed in W.P.(Cr.) No.808 of 2023.

5. In view of the law declared by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Dhanbad is not a competent authority to

pass the order of confiscation. Accordingly, the order dated 21. 07.2023 in Confiscation Case No.19/2022 is, hereby, quashed.

6. This petition is allowed and disposed of.

From The Blog
Tamil Nadu Ex-Minister K. Ponnusamy Haunted by Old Debt Defaults in Corruption Case
Dec
04
2025

Court News

Tamil Nadu Ex-Minister K. Ponnusamy Haunted by Old Debt Defaults in Corruption Case
Read More
Supreme Court of India Warns: Police and Courts Must Avoid Criminal Charges in Civil Disputes
Dec
04
2025

Court News

Supreme Court of India Warns: Police and Courts Must Avoid Criminal Charges in Civil Disputes
Read More