Aakash Gurung & Ors Vs State Of Sikkim & Ors.

Sikkim High Court 14 Aug 2024 Writ Petition (C) No. 34 Of 2023 (2024) 08 SIK CK 0028
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (C) No. 34 Of 2023

Hon'ble Bench

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

Advocates

Karma Thinlay, Yashir N. Tamang, Zamyang Norbu Bhutia, Chetan Sharma, Zangpo Sherpa, Sujan Sunwar, Bhusan Nepal

Judgement Text

Translate:

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1. The learned counsel for the respondent nos. 13, 15, 16, 27 and 28 submits that on 24.06.2024 he had filed counter affidavit on behalf of respondent

nos. 13, 15, 16, 27 and 28 through CIS and thereafter, he also received the report stating that it has been approved. However, according to the learned

Senior Counsel representing the petitioners when he sought to file rejoinder to the counter affidavit filed by respondent nos. 13, 15, 16, 27 and 28 as

served to him, he was informed by the Registry to withdraw the rejoinder as the counter affidavit of respondent nos. 13, 15, 16, 27 and 28 was not on

record. The Registry to get to the bottom of it before the next date and submit a report.

2. The learned Additional Advocate General representing respondent no.3 submits that the defect in the counter affidavit filed by them earlier has

been cured. The same is taken on record. Two weeks time is granted to the petitioners to file rejoinder, if required.

3. List on 27.09.2024.

From The Blog
J&K High Court: Dealer and Manufacturer Jointly Liable for Car Defects Reported Within Warranty Period
Dec
08
2025

Court News

J&K High Court: Dealer and Manufacturer Jointly Liable for Car Defects Reported Within Warranty Period
Read More
ITAT Ahmedabad: Assessment Order Invalid Without DVO Report, Property Valuation Additions Quashed
Dec
08
2025

Court News

ITAT Ahmedabad: Assessment Order Invalid Without DVO Report, Property Valuation Additions Quashed
Read More