Jairam Bhuiyan Vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court 30 Sep 2024 Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No.534 Of 2023 (2024) 09 JH CK 0018
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No.534 Of 2023

Hon'ble Bench

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J

Advocates

Rohan Mazumdar, Pankaj Kumar

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 308, 341

Judgement Text

Translate:

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J

1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent State.

2. This appeal is already admitted and the lower court records are on the record.

3. I.A. No. 7176 of 2024 has been filed for suspension of sentence during pendency of this appeal.

4. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has been convicted by the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated

18.07.2023 and 24.07.2023 respectively passed in Sessions Trial No.176 of 2016, arising out of Ramkanda P.S. Case No.11 of 2016, G.R. No.1017 of

2016, by learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Garhwa, where by appellant has been convicted under sections 308 and 341 of the IPC and appellant

has been sentenced to undergo RI for five years along with fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine further three months RI under section

308 IPC and the appellant has further been sentenced to undergo SI for one month along with fine of Rs.200/- and in default thereof, three days SI

under section 341 IPC and both the sentences shall run concurrently.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the said occurrence is said to be occurred on 12.05.2016 and the FIR was registered on 15.05.2016

and there is no explanation of inordinate delay in instituting the FIR. He submits that father of the injured and the informant are serving the life

sentence for murder of his own father and for that case the appellant due to enmity he has been implicated in the present case. He further submits

that during trial the appellant remained in custody from 16.05.2020 to 16.08.2020 and after trial, he is in custody since 18.07.2023 and remained in

custody for more than 1 year and five months.

6. Learned counsel for the respondent State opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that half of the sentence has not been completed by the

appellant.

7. Considering that the appellant has remained in custody for one year and five months and there is enmity between the parties and for that the father

of the injured and the informant are serving life sentence for murder of own father and further there is delay in institution of the FIR, I am inclined to

suspend the sentence of the appellant, during pendency of this appeal.

8. Accordingly, the appellant- Jairam Bhuiyan, is, hereby, directed to be released on bail, during pendency of this appeal, on furnishing bail bond of

Rs.25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Garhwa, in

connection with Sessions Trial No.176 of 2016, arising out of Ramkanda P.S. Case No.11 of 2016, G.R. No.1017 of 2016.

9. I.A. No. 7176 of 2024 stands disposed of.

From The Blog
Tamil Nadu Ex-Minister K. Ponnusamy Haunted by Old Debt Defaults in Corruption Case
Dec
04
2025

Court News

Tamil Nadu Ex-Minister K. Ponnusamy Haunted by Old Debt Defaults in Corruption Case
Read More
Supreme Court of India Warns: Police and Courts Must Avoid Criminal Charges in Civil Disputes
Dec
04
2025

Court News

Supreme Court of India Warns: Police and Courts Must Avoid Criminal Charges in Civil Disputes
Read More