Rustom @ Syed Ali Baqai Vs State Of Karnataka Rept. By Kempegowdanagar

Karnataka High Court At Bengaluru 12 Sep 2024 Criminal Petition No. 4085 Of 2024 (2024) 09 KAR CK 0009
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Petition No. 4085 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

V Srishananda, J

Advocates

Syed Khaleel Pasha, Channappa Erappa

Final Decision

Dismissed

Acts Referred
  • sCode Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 41(A), 438

Judgement Text

Translate:

V Srishananda, J

1. Heard Sri Syed Khaleel Pasha, learned counsel for the petitioner/accused No.4 and Sri Channappa Erappa, learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent/State.

2. Petitioner is before this Court with a successive bail request for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

3. The charge sheet came to be filed. In the charge sheet, petitioner has been shown as accused No.4 and has been shown as absconding accused.

4. In fact, learned counsel for the petitioner has also placed before the court a notice under Section 41 (A) Cr.P.C., dated 16.03.2024.

5. Admittedly, the petitioner did not appear before the police as per the notice dated 16.03.2024.

6. Since the petitioner did not adhere to the callings of notice, he has been shown as an absconding accused. Therefore, grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner/accused No.4 would not arise.

Accordingly, criminal petition is hereby rejected.

From The Blog
CBDT Cracks Down on Bogus Deduction Claims: Taxpayers to Get SMS and Email Alerts
Dec
16
2025

Court News

CBDT Cracks Down on Bogus Deduction Claims: Taxpayers to Get SMS and Email Alerts
Read More
Gujarat High Court: Myopic Reading of Sections 129 & 130 of CGST Act Would Create Hostility
Dec
16
2025

Court News

Gujarat High Court: Myopic Reading of Sections 129 & 130 of CGST Act Would Create Hostility
Read More