Ejaj Alias Aazad Vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court 7 Nov 2024 First Bail Application No. 2091 Of 2024 (2024) 11 UK CK 0007
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

First Bail Application No. 2091 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

Ravindra Maithani, J

Advocates

Gaurav Singh, Rangoli Purohit

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 8, 21, 29, 60

Judgement Text

Translate:

Ravindra Maithani, J

1. Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.637 of 2024, under Sections 8/21/29/60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

(“the Actâ€​), Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. According to the FIR, on 06.10.2024, police intercepted a vehicle in which the applicant was one of the occupants and from the possession of the

applicant, 49 grams smack was recovered.

4. It is the case of the applicant that there is no independent witness; there has been non-compliance of the provisions of the Act; the alleged

recovered quantity is less than commercial; he is not a previous convict.

5. Learned State Counsel would submit that the bail rejection order does not reveal any previous conviction of the applicant.

6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

7. The bail application is allowed.

8. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the

satisfaction of the court concerned.

From The Blog
Legal & Regulatory Challenges: India vs USA
Nov
17
2025

Court News

Legal & Regulatory Challenges: India vs USA
Read More
Supreme Court to Hear Sahara Employees’ Plea for Pending Salaries Amid SEBI Refund Case
Nov
17
2025

Court News

Supreme Court to Hear Sahara Employees’ Plea for Pending Salaries Amid SEBI Refund Case
Read More