Santosh Kashyap Vs District Magistrate Haridwar & Others

Uttarakhand High Court 8 Nov 2024 Writ Petition Miscellaneous Single No. 3064 Of 2024 (2024) 11 UK CK 0090
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition Miscellaneous Single No. 3064 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

Pankaj Purohit, J

Advocates

Avidit Noliyal, Devendra Pant, Lalit Miglani

Final Decision

Dismissed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Pankaj Purohit, J

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2. After arguing for a considerable period, learned Counsel appearing for petitioner submitted at bar that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant

writ petition with liberty to file fresh with better particulars, if cause of action arises.

3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn subject to the aforesaid liberty.

4. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Clarifies Section 27 Evidence Act: Only “Fact Discovered” Admissible, Not Entire Statement
Nov
19
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Clarifies Section 27 Evidence Act: Only “Fact Discovered” Admissible, Not Entire Statement
Read More
Bar Council of India Defends Rules Allowing Foreign Law Firms in Delhi High Court
Nov
19
2025

Court News

Bar Council of India Defends Rules Allowing Foreign Law Firms in Delhi High Court
Read More