Vijaya Vs Anantha Gummani

Karnataka High Court At Bengaluru 26 Nov 2024 Criminal Appeal No. 1281 Of 2019 (2024) 11 KAR CK 0061
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Appeal No. 1281 Of 2019

Hon'ble Bench

Shivashankar Amarannavar, J

Advocates

U J Hari Parasad

Final Decision

Dismissed

Acts Referred
  • Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 374(2)
  • Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 &mash; Section 138

Judgement Text

Translate:

Shivashankar Amarannavar, J

1. This appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C praying to set aside the order passed in Crl.Rev.P.No.365/2010 by the LV Additional City Civil

and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru.

2. The appellant â€"accused has been convicted for offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter

referred to as “N.I.Act†for brevity) in C.C.No.12579/2009 by the XVI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru by judgment dated

27.09.2010 and sentenced to pay fine of Rs.25,000/-.

3. Respondent â€"complainant has challenged the sentence passed in C.C.No.12579/2009 in Crl.Rev.P.No.365/2020 before the LV Additional City

Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru. The said revision petition came to be allowed and the sentence has been enhanced to fine of Rs.1,35,000/- by

order dated 05.03.2019 by the LV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru.

4. The said order of enhancement of the fine passed in Criminal Rev.P.No.365/2010 dated 05.03.2019 by the LV Additional City Civil and Sessions

Judge, Bengaluru has been challenged in this appeal.

5. The appellant â€"accused has not challenged the judgment of conviction passed in C.C.No.12579/2009 dated 27.09.2010. The order of conviction

has not been passed by the Sessions Court but it is passed by the XVI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru.

6. The present appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C challenging the order enhancing sentence passed in Crl.Rev.P.No.365/2010 is not

maintainable.

7. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable.

8. In view of the disposal of the appeal, IA No.2/2019 does not survive for consideration.

Hence, IA No.2/2019 is disposed of.

From The Blog
Legal & Regulatory Challenges: India vs USA
Nov
17
2025

Court News

Legal & Regulatory Challenges: India vs USA
Read More
Supreme Court to Hear Sahara Employees’ Plea for Pending Salaries Amid SEBI Refund Case
Nov
17
2025

Court News

Supreme Court to Hear Sahara Employees’ Plea for Pending Salaries Amid SEBI Refund Case
Read More