Madhav Chandra Singh Vs State Of Jharkhand `

Jharkhand High Court 9 Sep 2024 Writ Petition (C) No. 4774 Of 2024 (2024) 09 JH CK 0092
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (C) No. 4774 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J

Advocates

Sunil Kumar

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred
  • Bihar and Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act, 1940 - Section 9

Judgement Text

Translate:

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondent State.

2. The prayer in this petition has been made for quashing of the order dated 22.10.2022 passed by the respondent no.5 which was exercised under

Bihar and Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act, 1940 and the vehicle of the petitioner has been seized.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the said order has been passed without deciding the objection made under section

9 of the said Act

4. Learned counsel for the respondent State accepts the said submission that without deciding the objection made under section 9 of the said Act, the

said order has been passed.

5. In view of above, the Court finds that there are statutory provision as contained in the said Act; to first invite objection under section 9 of the said

Act and after providing full opportunity of hearing and considering the objection, the appropriate order is required to be passed which has not been

done in the case in hand. The case of the petitioner is covered in light of the judgment of this Court rendered in the case of Jagdish Mahto v. State

of Jharkhand, (2023)AIR (Jharkhand) 29.

6. In view of above, the order dated 22.10.2022 passed by the respondent no.5 is hereby quashed.

7. The matter is remitted back to the respondent no.5 who will decide the matter afresh after providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in light

of the observation made by this Court in the case of Jagdish Mahto(supra).

8. The Certificate officer is directed to decide the objection filed under section 9 of the said Act, 1914 on its own merit and in accordance with law

within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Depending upon the outcome of the aforesaid decision, the Certificate

Officer is at liberty to proceed further in accordance with law. Needless to say that if the certificate debtor will not appear before the Certificate

Officer, the Certificate Officer will be at liberty to proceed in accordance with law.

9. With above observation and direction, this petition is accordingly disposed of.

10. Pending petition if any also stands disposed of accordingly.

From The Blog
Tamil Nadu Ex-Minister K. Ponnusamy Haunted by Old Debt Defaults in Corruption Case
Dec
04
2025

Court News

Tamil Nadu Ex-Minister K. Ponnusamy Haunted by Old Debt Defaults in Corruption Case
Read More
Supreme Court of India Warns: Police and Courts Must Avoid Criminal Charges in Civil Disputes
Dec
04
2025

Court News

Supreme Court of India Warns: Police and Courts Must Avoid Criminal Charges in Civil Disputes
Read More