Balbir Singh And Another Vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court 16 Oct 2024 Anticipatory Bail Application No. 685 Of 2024 (2024) 10 UK CK 0054
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Anticipatory Bail Application No. 685 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

Ravindra Maithani, J

Advocates

Rajat Mittal, M.A. Khan

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 406, 504, 506

Judgement Text

Translate:

Ravindra Maithani, J

1. Delay in filing counter affidavit is condoned. Counter Affidavit is taken on record. Delay Condonation Application IA No.1 of 2024 stands disposed

of, accordingly.

2. Applicants Balbir Singh and Vivek seek anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.0236 of 2024, under Sections 406, 504 and 506 IPC, Police Station

Vikasnagar, District Dehradun.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4. According to the FIR, the applicant no.1 executed an agreement to sale with the informant and took some money, but he did not execute the sale

deed. The FIR records that the property had some maintenance issues also, which were not resolved by the applicant no.1. When the informant got

the repair done, the FIR records that the applicant no.1 took possession of the property.

5. Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that, in fact, Ankush has wrongly been named in the FIR. The son of the applicant no.1, Balbir

Singh, is the applicant no.2, Vivek; the dispute is purely civil in nature; after agreement to sale, the informant never came forward for executing the

sale deed, for which a notice was given by the applicant no.1 to the informant. He would refer to the notices issued by the applicant no.1 and the reply

received by him from the informant.

6. Learned State Counsel admits that the applicant no.2, Vivek, is named as Ankush in the FIR. He would submit that despite agreement to sale, the

applicant no.1 did not execute the sale deed.

7. Having considered, this Court is of the view that this is a case, in which the applicants should be granted anticipatory bail. The instant anticipatory

bail application deserves to be allowed.

8. The anticipatory bail application is allowed.

9. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicants shall be enlarged on bail on their furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, by

each one of them, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (“AOâ€). In addition to it, the applicants shall also comply with the following

conditions:-

(i) The applicants shall co-operate with the investigation.

(ii) The applicants shall not approach any witness in any manner, whatsoever.

(iii) The applicants shall not leave the country without prior permission of the court concerned.

(iv) The applicants shall deposit their passports with the AO. The passports may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. In case the

applicants do not have passport, they shall give an undertaking to that effect to the AO.

(v) The applicants shall also give an undertaking on (i), (ii) & (iii) above.

From The Blog
Supreme Court: SC Certificate Can Be Issued Based on Mother’s Caste, Not Non-SC Father
Dec
10
2025

Court News

Supreme Court: SC Certificate Can Be Issued Based on Mother’s Caste, Not Non-SC Father
Read More
Goa Nightclub Fire Exposes Illegal Operations: Luthra Brothers Face Culpable Homicide Charges
Dec
10
2025

Court News

Goa Nightclub Fire Exposes Illegal Operations: Luthra Brothers Face Culpable Homicide Charges
Read More