Nitinkumar Kantilal Parmar Vs State of Gujarat and Others

Gujarat High Court 13 Sep 2010 Special Civil Application No. 8737 of 2009 (2010) 09 GUJ CK 0083
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Special Civil Application No. 8737 of 2009

Hon'ble Bench

R.R. Tripathi, J

Advocates

K.G. Pandit, for the Appellant; Nirag Pathak, AGP for Respondent 1, for the Respondent

Judgement Text

Translate:

Ravi R. Tripathi, J.@mdashOn a request made by learned advocate Mr. Pandit for the petitioner, the matter is taken up for Final Hearing. The learned advocate for the petitioner invited attention of the Court to a communication dated 24th September 2008, a copy of which is produced at Annexure ''D'', page 53. The learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that the decision is reached by the authorities by applying wrong circular, which is not applicable to the facts of the case. The learned advocate for the petitioner relied upon a decision of this Court (Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice K.S. Jhaveri) in the matter of Dalsukhbhai Harjivanbhai Nagdukiya v. State of Gujarat and 4 Ors. in Special Civil Application No. 7543 of 2009, which was decided on 19th April 2010. The learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that for the reasons for which the said petition was allowed, this petition is required to be allowed, as another Special Civil Application being No. 8481 of 2010 was allowed by this Court by judgment and order dated 6th September 2010.

2. Learned AGP Mr. Pathak has no objection if the matter is heard finally today. Though served, nobody appears for respondent No. 2.

3. For the reasons recorded in Special Civil Application No. 7543 of 2009, which was decided on 19th April 2010, this petition is allowed. The communication dated 24th September 2008 is hereby quashed and set aside. The matter is remitted back to the Commissioner, Mid-day Meal and Schools, Gandhinagar for deciding the case of the petitioner in light of the policy which is applicable to the facts of the present case.

3.1 The learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has already filed a Representation dated 13th October 2008. He requests that the same be directed to be decided in a prescribed time frame.

3.2 The request is granted. The authority is directed to decide the Representation, Annexure ''E'', dated 13th October 2008, as expeditiously as possible but not later than 27th October 2010.

4. Rule is made absolute with no order as to costs. A copy of this order be made available to learned AGP Mr. Pathak for its onward communication for compliance.

From The Blog
Delhi High Court Mandates e-KYC for Domain Registrations to Stop Fraudulent Websites and Protect Consumers
Jan
11
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Mandates e-KYC for Domain Registrations to Stop Fraudulent Websites and Protect Consumers
Read More
Supreme Court: Civil Verdict Not a Shield Against Crime, Restores Criminal Trial in Family Property Dispute
Jan
11
2026

Court News

Supreme Court: Civil Verdict Not a Shield Against Crime, Restores Criminal Trial in Family Property Dispute
Read More