Commissioner of Service Tax Vs Atria Convergence Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Karnataka High Court 9 Sep 2010 CEA No. 75 of 2009 (2010) 09 KAR CK 0101
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

CEA No. 75 of 2009

Hon'ble Bench

N. Kumar, J; H.S. Kempanna, J

Advocates

Jeevan J. Neeralgi, for the Appellant;

Final Decision

Dismissed

Acts Referred
  • Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35 G, 35 L (b)

Judgement Text

Translate:

N. Kumar, J.@mdashThe question that arise for consideration in this appeal is whether the assessee at the relevant point of time was a Cable Operator or Multi System Operator and whether the notification issued exempting Multi System Operators from payment of service tax is applicable to the assessee.

2. The Tribunal has recorded a finding that the assessee is a Multi System Operator and the notification exempts payment of service tax and therefore the assessee is liable to pay nil tax. It is that determination of the question regarding the rate of duty as also the valuation, which are assailed in this appeal.

3. Section 35G of the Excise Act under which the present appeal is filed excludes the jurisdiction of the High Court regarding the orders which involves determination of the question relating to the rate of duty and value of goods and appeal is provided to the Apex Court u/s 35L(b) of the Act.

4. In that view of the matter, the appeal preferred before this Court is not maintainable. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected reserving liberty to the appellant to approach the Apex Court u/s 35L(b) of the Excise Act. Ordered accordingly.

From The Blog
Delhi High Court Mandates e-KYC for Domain Registrations to Stop Fraudulent Websites and Protect Consumers
Jan
11
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Mandates e-KYC for Domain Registrations to Stop Fraudulent Websites and Protect Consumers
Read More
Supreme Court: Civil Verdict Not a Shield Against Crime, Restores Criminal Trial in Family Property Dispute
Jan
11
2026

Court News

Supreme Court: Civil Verdict Not a Shield Against Crime, Restores Criminal Trial in Family Property Dispute
Read More