Prashanth Kadur R/by GPA Holder K.M. Reuka Vs Shilpa Uppini

Karnataka High Court 30 Aug 2010 Misc. First Appeal No. 3319 of 2010 (2010) 08 KAR CK 0096
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Misc. First Appeal No. 3319 of 2010

Hon'ble Bench

K.L. Manjunath, J; B. Manohar, J

Advocates

Rajesh Shettigar, for the Appellant;

Final Decision

Dismissed

Acts Referred
  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 13 (1) (ia), 13 (1) (ib), 13 (1) (iii)

Judgement Text

Translate:

K.L. Manjunath, J.@mdashAppellant''s petition filed to seek divorce u/s 13 (1)(ia), (ib), (1)(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act has been rejected by the court below on the ground of maintainability.

2. MC No. 2040/08 was instituted by the appellant to dissolve the marriage solemnized between him and the respondent through his PA Holder Mr. K.M. Renuka. Family Court has dismissed the petition on 29.3.2010 on the ground that Power of Attorney given by the appellant herein is not to present any divorce petition and the GPA was executed by the appellant for some other purpose. Challenging the same, present appeal is filed.

3. Having argued the matter at length and considering the contents of Annexure-C GPA said to have been executed by the appellant heroin in favour of his uncle Mr. K.M. Renuka. Appellant''s counsel is requesting this Court to permit him to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.

4. Granting such liberty, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

From The Blog
NFRA Tightens Rules: Auditors Must Hold Structured Meetings with Audit Committees
Jan
18
2026

Court News

NFRA Tightens Rules: Auditors Must Hold Structured Meetings with Audit Committees
Read More
Delhi Police EOW Books Suraksha Realty for Alleged ₹230 Crore Funds Diversion
Jan
18
2026

Court News

Delhi Police EOW Books Suraksha Realty for Alleged ₹230 Crore Funds Diversion
Read More