Uchambally Thattari Damu Vs The Special Tahsildar (LA)

High Court Of Kerala 13 Sep 2010 LA. App. No. 945 of 2010 (2010) 09 KL CK 0391
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

LA. App. No. 945 of 2010

Hon'ble Bench

T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J; K.M. Joseph, J

Advocates

K.P. Hareendran, for the Appellant; No Appearance, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Judgement Text

Translate:

K.M. Joseph, J.@mdashAppellant has approached this Court against the Judgment in LAR. No. 127 of 1998 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Thalassery. An extent of .0552 hectares in RS. No. 42/1 and .0602 hectares in RS. No. 41/13 of Kodiyeri Amsom of Thalassery Taluk were acquired for establishment of a cancer hospital. The Officer fixed the land value at Rs. 3,700/ = per cent. The Land Acquisition Officer awarded a total compensation of Rs. 1,74,591/ = which included the value of the stone wall. On a reference u/s 18, the Sub Court enhanced the land value to Rs. 5,500/ = per cent. It is aggrieved by the fixation of the land value at Rs. 5,500/ = per cent that the appellant is before us.

2. We heard the learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned Government Pleader. Learned Counsel for the appellant would point out that in respect of similar matter, this Court has fixed the land value at Rs. 10,000/ = per cent. Learned Government Pleader does not dispute the correctness of the submission or that the said value cannot be fixed for the land in question. In such circumstances, we accept the contention of the appellant and fix the land value at Rs. 10,000/ = (Rupees Ten Thousand) per cent and the additional compensation will carry interest as per law. The appellant also is entitled to additional solatium on the basis of the market value as fixed. The additional solatium will also carry interest. We, however, make it clear that the appellant will not be entitled to interest u/s 28 during the period of 2569 days which was the period of delay in filing the Appeal and we direct that the interim order dated 11.8.2010 passed by this Court shall be annexed to this Judgment.

The Appeal is allowed as above.

From The Blog
Delhi High Court Mandates e-KYC for Domain Registrations to Stop Fraudulent Websites and Protect Consumers
Jan
11
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Mandates e-KYC for Domain Registrations to Stop Fraudulent Websites and Protect Consumers
Read More
Supreme Court: Civil Verdict Not a Shield Against Crime, Restores Criminal Trial in Family Property Dispute
Jan
11
2026

Court News

Supreme Court: Civil Verdict Not a Shield Against Crime, Restores Criminal Trial in Family Property Dispute
Read More