Roshanali Burhanali Syed Vs State of Gujarat

Supreme Court of India 26 Mar 1981 Criminal Appeal No. 259 Of 1976 (1981) 03 SC CK 0015
Bench: Full Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Appeal No. 259 Of 1976

Hon'ble Bench

S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, J; Baharul Islam, J; A. Varadarajan, J

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Section 4(1), 6

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. This appeal by special leave is confined only to the question of sentence and probation. The learned Sessions Judge was requested to release the appellant on probation having regard to the petty nature of the offence. The Sessions Judge would have accepted the request of the appellant but he was under the impression that under the provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 a person who was above 21 years of age could not be released on probation. The learned Sessions Judge seems to have overlooked the provisions of Section 4(1) of the Act which does not contain any restriction that the offender must be 21 or below that age although this restriction is to be found in Section 6.

2. We therefore, allow the appeal to the extent that instead of sentencing the appellant at once to imprisonment, we direct that he may be released on executing a bond of good behaviour for a period of one year and on furnishing two sureties of Rs. 500 each and a personal recognizance bond of the same amount. In case he is found to commit some offence during this period, he will be directed to appear and receive the sentence which has been imposed on him.

From The Blog
ITAT Ahmedabad Rules in Favor of Woman: Tax Notice on ₹51 Lakh Property Purchase Quashed
Nov
12
2025

Court News

ITAT Ahmedabad Rules in Favor of Woman: Tax Notice on ₹51 Lakh Property Purchase Quashed
Read More
Supreme Court Rules: Transfer of Property Title Not Liable for Service Tax
Nov
12
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Rules: Transfer of Property Title Not Liable for Service Tax
Read More