Latest Judgements
-
Delhi High Court26/06/2020
Comdt. S.K. Singh Vs Union Of India & OrsActs: Coast Guard (General) Rules, 1986
-
Delhi High Court26/06/2020
Ge Power India Ltd. Vs NHPC LimitedActs: National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 -- Copyright Act, 1957 -- Insolvency and...
-
Delhi High Court26/06/2020
Vikas Vs Union Of India & OrsActs: Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 -- Railway Protection Force Act, 1985
-
Delhi High Court26/06/2020
Vishesh Verma Vs State (Govt. Of Nct Delhi) -
High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh25/06/2020
Vikram Vs State Of HaryanaActs: Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 -- Indian Penal Code, 1860
-
High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh25/06/2020
Jarnail Singh Vs State Of PunjabActs: Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 -- Indian Penal Code, 1860 -- Arms Act, 1959
Most Searched Acts
Most Searched Documents
- gift deed of the amounts paid under an agreement to sell by nomination of all the rights, titles and interest
- gift deed of amount by cheque
- gift by father to his son of land with building with mortgage
- conditional gift deed in favour of wife and nephew
- gift deed gifting away goodwill of business, trade marks and patent
Most Viewed Lawyers
-
kishan retired judge
Exp : 34 Years, City : Bangalore Urban
-
sr. adv. vinay kumar garg
Exp : 29 Years, City : New Delhi
-
anant kumar agarwal
Exp : 10 Years, City : New Delhi
-
sr. adv vivek sood
Exp : 26 Years, City : New Delhi
-
sr. advocate sanjeev kuthiala
Exp : 33 Years, City : Shimla
-
ashval vaderaa
Exp : 20 Years, City : New Delhi
Landmark Judgements
-
Supreme Court of India14/11/2019
Perception of individuals cannot be the basis of a fishing and roving enquiry. The processes have been broadly followed. The need for the aircraft is not in doubt, and the quality of the aircraft is not in question.
yashwant sinha & ors. Vs central bureau of investigation through its director & anr -
Supreme Court Of India14/11/2019
A larger bench will decide whether traditional practices can prevent entry of women at religious places. Till such time entry of women is permitted as previous verdict on September 28th, 2018 was not overturned.
kantaru rajeevaru Vs indian young lawyers association thr.its general secretary and ors. -
Supreme Court Of India13/11/2019
The office of the Chief Justice of India is a public authority and falls within the ambit of the Right to Information Act. Judicial independence and judicial accountability go hand-in-hand. RTI cannot be used as a tool of surveillance. Judicial independence has to be kept in mind while dealing with transparency.
central public information officer, supreme court of india Vs subhash chandra agarwal -
Supreme Court Of India09/11/2019
Hindus would get the entire disputed 2.77 acres in Ayodhya. Possession of land to remain with Centre. Muslims will get alternate five acres of land either in the surplus 67 acres acquired in and around the disputed structure by the central government or any other "prominent" place. A trust will be formed in 3 months to build a temple on the disputed land.
m siddiq (d) thr lrs Vs mahant suresh das & ors -
Supreme Court Of India14/12/2018
Accused is entitled to acquittal in case the informant and the investigative officer is the same person.
manohar lal sharma Vs narendra damodardas modi & ors.
Get In Touch With Us
We are here to help. Want to learn more about our services? Please get in touch, we'd love to hear from you!
