Gour Chand Audhikari Vs Komal Chandra Pal

Calcutta High Court 8 Jan 1897 (1897) 01 CAL CK 0001
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Gordon, J; Ghose, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

Ghose and Gordon, JJ.@mdashWe think that this rule must be made absolute. In doing so, we need only refer to the case of Nilratan Sen v. Jogesh Chundra Bhuttacharjee ILR 23 Cal. 983 in which a view, contrary to that which has been taken by the Magistrate, was adopted by this Court. The order reviving the complaint and the subsequent proceedings will be set aside, and the fine imposed upon the petitioner, if realized, will be refunded.

From The Blog
Foreign Shares Not Reported in Schedule FA: Legal Consequences, Scenarios, and What Taxpayers Must Do
Jan
08
2026

Court News

Foreign Shares Not Reported in Schedule FA: Legal Consequences, Scenarios, and What Taxpayers Must Do
Read More
CCI Cracks Down on Collusive Bidding in Defence Tender: Why Fair Competition Protects Price Discovery
Jan
08
2026

Court News

CCI Cracks Down on Collusive Bidding in Defence Tender: Why Fair Competition Protects Price Discovery
Read More