Dirgnath Kuar Vs Narhar Singh and Another

Allahabad High Court 16 Jun 1879 (1880) ILR (All) 409
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Robert Stuart, C.J; Straight, J

Final Decision

Dismissed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Straight, J.@mdashThis case resolves itself into a mere question of what is a reasonable amount to fix as the allowance for maintenance to the

respondent. It must be taken that, with the exception of the first, all the other grounds of appeal are abandoned, in fact while admitting the liability

of his clients to the payment of maintenance to the respondent, the whole of the argument and observations of the pleader for the appellants were

adduced to the question of amount and to the extravagance of the sum fixed by the Subordinate judge. It being conceded, therefore, that the

respondent is entitled to maintenance at the hands of the appellants, the duty cast upon this Court is to determine, as a matter of equity, whether,

having regard to all the circumstances of the case, the amount decreed in the Court below is unreasonable. It was urged on the part of the

appellants, that the position of a ""Hindu mother"" of a child deceased since her husband''s death is, so far as concerns the principle upon which

allowance of maintenance has to be computed, a very inferior one to that of a ""Hindu widow"" without a child or children. As a childless widow, it is

said, many ceremonial duties devolve upon her, entailing expenses which ought to be taken into account, whereas if she bear a son, most if not all

of those pass over to him or to his representatives. In plain terms it amounts to this, that a ""childless widow"" is entitled to allowance on a higher

scale than a ""widowed mother.

2. There was nothing either in the argument addressed to us nor in the circumstances of this case itself to induce us to draw such a distinction here,

and it is impossible to avoid remarking that if matters of feeling cap be admitted, and we are not sure they should not in arriving at the amount of

what is a reasonable allowance, the case of a ""widowed mother"" deprived of her only son and the contingent advantages that might have accrued

to her had he survived seems the more deserving of sympathy and consideration. It is a fact not to be lost sight of in this ease that, down to the

death of the respondent''s son, Ruda Mani Singh, on the 2nd December 1876, the appellants made due provision for her and her child according

to their position and the family custom, but immediately after the latter''s decease they stop the allowance not only for the one but as to both. Such

a proceeding appears indefensible and altogether inconsistent with the position they now take up. They are actually in enjoyment of the profits of

the share of the villages to which, had the respondent''s husband lived, he would have been entitled, and it is relatively to the amount of these profits

that the sum to be allowed here should be calculated. No precedents were quoted to us fixing any principle of computation to apply to a case like

the present, and it may well be that there are none, for the question that now arises involves equitable considerations that must of necessity be

affected by the peculiar circumstances of each individual case. In our opinion this appeal should be dismissed and the order of the Subordinate

Judge be affirmed with costs.

From The Blog
The Ahmedabad St. Xavier's College Society Vs State of Gujarat (1974)
Oct
18
2025

Landmark Judgements

The Ahmedabad St. Xavier's College Society Vs State of Gujarat (1974)
Read More
Pandit M.S.M. Sharma vs Dr. Shree Krishna Sinha and Others (1960)
Oct
18
2025

Landmark Judgements

Pandit M.S.M. Sharma vs Dr. Shree Krishna Sinha and Others (1960)
Read More