Sukh Ram Vs State of U.P.and others

Allahabad High Court 11 Dec 2008
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Alok Kumar Singh, J and Suresh Chandra Chaurasia, J

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

S. C. Chaurasia, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. who has put in appearance on behalf of opposite parties nos. 1 to 3 and perused the

F.I.R. as also the relevant material on record.

There is no need to issue notices to opposite parties nos. 4, 5 and 6 who are accused in this case hence the issuance of notices in respect of them

is dispensed with.

It is submitted that the F.I.R. in question was lodged on 19.09.2007 under Section 302 I.P.C. but till date neither any arrest has been made nor

any significant progress has been achieved in the investigation. It is further said that a representation dated 25.04.2008 was also moved addressed

to opposite party no. 2, Senior Superintendent of Police, Lucknow which has also not been disposed of till date.

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is finally disposed of with a direction that the aforesaid representation

dated 25.04.2008 may be disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law by opposite party no. 2 and he may also ensure proper and

expeditious investigation in the matter.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Reviews Forest Rights Act Protecting Livelihoods
Oct
24
2025

Story

Supreme Court Reviews Forest Rights Act Protecting Livelihoods
Read More
Patna HC: Promotions Valid Only from Actual or DPC Date
Oct
24
2025

Story

Patna HC: Promotions Valid Only from Actual or DPC Date
Read More