Virendra Pratap Singh Vs State of U.P.

Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) 9 Apr 2009 (2009) 04 AHC CK 0146
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Alok Kumar Singh, J

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

Alok K. Singh, J.

Heard.

Admit.

Call for the lower court record.

List for hearing on its turn after the record is received.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. on the prayer for bail.

The appellant has been convicted and sentenced in Sessions Trial No.68 of 2005 as under

1.Under Section 325/34 I.P.C. Two years'' R.I. with a fine of Rs.1000/.

2.Under Section 323/34 I.P.C.Three months'' R.I.

It is submitted that the severity of punishment is not much and the nature of accusation is also not very serious. During trial he was on bail which he

never misused. Presently he is on interim bail. It is also submitted that speedy justice is a fundamental right but the appeal may take a couple of

years or even more in its final disposal. The appellant has every hope of success in the appeal.

The bail is, however, opposed by learned A.G.A.

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and without entering into merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail. Let the

appellant (Virendra Pratap Singh) be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the

Magistrate/court concerned.

However, the fine is not stayed. Let the same be deposited within one month from the date of his release, if not already deposited. Subject to the

above the sentence of imprisonment shall remain suspended during the pendency of the appeal.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Rejects NALSA Appeal Filed Sans Convict Consent
Oct
30
2025

Story

Supreme Court Rejects NALSA Appeal Filed Sans Convict Consent
Read More
Supreme Court Raps Insurers for Technical Appeals in Claims
Oct
30
2025

Story

Supreme Court Raps Insurers for Technical Appeals in Claims
Read More