B.P. Jeevan Reddy, C.J.@mdashu/s 256(1) of the income tax Act, 1961, the following question has been stated by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, Delhi Bench ''E'':
Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the assesses was entitled to the deduction of a
sum of Rs. 78,569, being ''the assessee''s accrued and ascertained liability for the assessment year 1968-69 ?
2. The assessment year concerned is 1968-69. By that year, Section 43B had not come into force. The assessee was maintaining his accounts on
the mercantile basis ; therefore, purchase tax collected by him, which was payable by him but not paid during the relevant accounting year, is all the
same deductible as held by this court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Poonam Chand Trilok Chand, and Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs. Durga Prasad Kamta Prasad, .
3. Accordingly, the question referred is answered in the affirmative that is in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
