Smt. Taramani Kumari Vs State of Rajasthan

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH) 5 Jan 2016 Criminal Writ Petition No.133 of 2015 (2016) 3 RajCriC 952
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Writ Petition No.133 of 2015

Hon'ble Bench

Mr. Banwari Lal Sharma, J.

Advocates

Mr. Dhoop Singh Poonia, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. Rajendra Singh Raghav, Dy. Government Advocate, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Disposed Off

Acts Referred

Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 21, 226

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

Mr. Banwari Lal Sharma, J.—The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India on behalf of the

petitioners/newly married couple praying inter alia that a direction be issued to the respondents to protect them as they apprehend danger to their

life and liberty at the hands of those, who are opposing the marriage.

2. Newly married couple is present in person. They have been identified by Mr. Dhoop Singh Poonia.

3. Smt. Taramani Kumari, petitioner No.1, appearing in person stated that she is about 25 years of age. She further stated that she had performed

marriage with petitioner No.2, viz., Sajjan Kumar, according to her own free will and accord and is living happily with him as a wife.

4. After hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, as well as learned Deputy Government Advocate and going through the contents

of the instant petition, this court is of the view that nobody can be permitted to take law in his own hands merely because marriage is not

acceptable.

5. Consequently, the present petition stands disposed of by issuing direction to the DCP Jaipur (West) to ensure necessary vigil that no harm is

caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners and their family members at the hands of those, who are opposing the marriage.

6. The above said order has been passed without determining the age and validity of the marriage of petitioners on the ground that those, who are

opposing the marriage, cannot cause harm to anybody.

From The Blog
SC: Brother Can Sell Father’s House Even Without Share
Oct
31
2025

Story

SC: Brother Can Sell Father’s House Even Without Share
Read More
SC to Decide If Women Can Face POCSO Penetrative Assault
Oct
31
2025

Story

SC to Decide If Women Can Face POCSO Penetrative Assault
Read More