Asharfi Lal Kushwaha Vs Raj Bahadur and Others

Allahabad High Court 28 Jan 2013 Matters Under Article 227 No. - 175 of 2013 (2013) 01 AHC CK 0191
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Matters Under Article 227 No. - 175 of 2013

Hon'ble Bench

Pankaj Mithal, J

Advocates

Mahesh Narain Singh and M.N. Singh, for the Appellant;

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred
  • Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) - Order 39 Rule 3A

Judgement Text

Translate:

Pankaj Mithal, J.@mdashIn Original Suit No. 1339 of 2011 (Raj Bahadur and Others Vs. Heera Lal and Others) an ex-parte injunction was granted. Petitioner has put in appearance and filed objection but the application is not finally decided.

2. Petitioner has filed this writ petition for a direction upon Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Additional Judge, Small Causes Court, Allahabad to consider and decide the temporary injunction application paper no. 6-C filed in aforesaid suit after considering the objections.

3. Rule 3A of Order 39 CPC stipulates that where an ex-parte injunction is granted, the injunction application should be finally decided within a period of 30 days. It further provides that the court shall not only make endeavour to finally dispose of the interim injunction application within 30 days from the date on which the injunction was granted but where court is unable to do, it shall record its reason for such inability. In view of the above provision, the petition is disposed of with the direction to the court concern to follow the mandate of Rule 3A of Order 39 CPC and to ensure speedy disposal of the interim injunction application finally.

From The Blog
Section 87A rebate STCG new tax regime
Nov
04
2025

Court News

Section 87A rebate STCG new tax regime
Read More
Power of Attorney validity India
Nov
04
2025

Court News

Power of Attorney validity India
Read More