Commissioner of Central Excise, Trichy - Appellant @HASH Neycer India Ltd.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA 11 May 2015 Civil Appeal No. 3684 of 2005. (2015) 05 SC CK 0048
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Civil Appeal No. 3684 of 2005.

Hon'ble Bench

A.K. Sikri and Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ.

Advocates

S/Shri K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Advocate, Arijit Prasad, Ms. Aruna Gupta and B. Krishna Prasad, Advocates, for the Appellant; Shri V.N. Raghupathy, Advocate, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Dismissed

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

1. The Department/Revenue wanted to add the value of Handle assembly, Ball valve assembly, overflow assembly, Syphon assembly, Outlet flange assembly and Flush pipe assembly, while arriving at the valuation of the flushing cisterns manufactured by the respondent. It is an admitted position that the aforesaid fittings are not manufactured by the assessee. It is also an admitted position that the assessee supplied the same to those buyers only who asked for that and in such a situation the assessee buys the aforesaid components from the market and supply to the buyers at their option. In these circumstances, the Tribunal has rightly declined to add the value of the aforesaid components which are not the part of flushing cistern manufactured by the assessee. Even otherwise, the amount of tax involved is not much. For these reasons we dismiss this appeal.

From The Blog
Aishwarya Rai Bachchan Wins ₹4 Crore Tax Case at ITAT Mumbai
Nov
07
2025

Court News

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan Wins ₹4 Crore Tax Case at ITAT Mumbai
Read More
Supreme Court to Decide If Section 12AA Registration Alone Grants Trusts 80G Tax Benefits for Donors
Nov
07
2025

Court News

Supreme Court to Decide If Section 12AA Registration Alone Grants Trusts 80G Tax Benefits for Donors
Read More