Zainab Begam Vs Manawar Husain Khan and Another

Allahabad High Court 27 Apr 1886 (1886) 04 AHC CK 0008
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Tyrrell, J; Brodhurst, J

Final Decision

Allowed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Brodhurst and Tyreell, J.@mdashThe Subordinate Judge, as a first appellate Court, had the appellant''s appeal before him. On the day fixed for hearing, and on adjourned dates, the appellant did not attend in person or by pleader. The Subordinate Judge then had but one legal course open to him--to dismiss, the appeal in default (Section 556). It was illegal to try the appeal on the merits. The judgment given in this way is a nullity, and must be cancelled: its existence therefore was and is no bar to the re-admission of the appellant''s appeal (Section 558), if it was not barred by limitation or otherwise inadmissible-We must allow this appeal, and direct the restoration to the file of the application for re-admission u/s 558 on the merits, the costs of this appeal being costs in the cause.

From The Blog
Allahabad High Court Quashes Lucknow Residency Rule for E-Rickshaw Registration, Calls It Arbitrary and Unconstitutional
Dec
02
2025

Court News

Allahabad High Court Quashes Lucknow Residency Rule for E-Rickshaw Registration, Calls It Arbitrary and Unconstitutional
Read More
NRI Property Buying in India: Legal Rules, Tax Challenges, and Sale Issues Explained
Dec
02
2025

Court News

NRI Property Buying in India: Legal Rules, Tax Challenges, and Sale Issues Explained
Read More