Alexander George Vs Commissioner of Income-Tax

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA 20 Mar 2015 Civil Appeal No. 1378 of 2004 (2015) 03 SC CK 0114
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Civil Appeal No. 1378 of 2004

Hon'ble Bench

A.K. Sikri and Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ.

Advocates

Tushar Mehta, Additional Solicitor General of India and Kavin Gulati, Senior Advocate and Rupesh Kumar, Kabir Hathi, Ms. Anil Katiyar and B.V. Balaram Das, Advocates, for the Respondent; Subramonium Prasad, Advocate, for the Appellant

Final Decision

Partly Allowed

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

1.The tax effect in the present case is Rs. 4,22,830. On this ground alone, we refuse to entertain the appeal and to decide the same on the merits. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

Himachal Pradesh HC
Sanjeev Kumar Vs State Of H.P.
16 Dec 2034
Himachal Pradesh HC
Laxman Dass & Others Vs Roop Chand
16 Dec 2033
From The Blog
Delhi High Court Declares Electricity a Fundamental Right Under Article 21
Dec
19
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Declares Electricity a Fundamental Right Under Article 21
Read More
Bombay High Court Rules: Property Inherited by Son Under Section 8 is Separate, Not Ancestral
Dec
19
2025

Court News

Bombay High Court Rules: Property Inherited by Son Under Section 8 is Separate, Not Ancestral
Read More
Quick Actions
Download PDF Open PDF in New Tab
Case Metadata
  • Citation: (2015) 373 ITR 49 : (2015) 14 SCC 728
  • Ck Citation: (2015) 03 SC CK 0114
  • Coram: A.K. Sikri and Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ.
  • Bench: Division Bench
  • Advocates: Tushar Mehta, Additional Solicitor General of India and Kavin Gulati, Senior Advocate and Rupesh Kumar, Kabir Hathi, Ms. Anil Katiyar and B.V. Balaram Das, Advocates, for the Respondent; Subramonium Prasad, Advocate, for the Appellant
  • Result: Partly Allowed
Stay Updated

Subscribe for weekly highlights on judgements, legal insights, and workflow tips.