Mahesh Thakur Vs State of H.P.

High Court of Himachal Pradesh 20 May 2016 Cr.MMO No. 90 of 2016 (2016) 05 SHI CK 0134
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Cr.MMO No. 90 of 2016

Hon'ble Bench

Mr. P.S. Rana, J.

Advocates

Mr. Naresh Sharma, Advocate, for the Petitioners; Mr. M.L. Chauhan, Addl. A.G. with Mr. R.K. Sharma, Dy. A.G, for the Non-Petitioner No. 1; Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the Non-Petitioner No. 2

Final Decision

Disposed Off

Acts Referred
  • Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) - Section 482
  • Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Section 323, Section 34, Section 498A

Judgement Text

Translate:

P.S. Rana, J.(Oral) - Present petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 for quashing proceedings of learned Trial Court initiated under Sections 498-A and 323 read with Section 34 IPC. It is submitted by learned Advocate appearing on behalf of petitioners that out of Court settlement executed inter se parties. It is further submitted by learned Advocate appearing on behalf of petitioners that complainant namely Sheetal is residing with her husband namely Mahesh Thakur. Prayer for acceptance of petition sought.

2. Per contra response filed on behalf of State of H.P. pleaded therein that FIR No.176/2015 dated 14.05.2015 is registered under Sections 498-A and 323 read with Section 34 IPC and final report of investigation submitted before criminal Court. It is pleaded that complainant namely Sheetal is at liberty to file application under Section 321 Cr.PC for withdrawal of case. It is further pleaded that alternate remedy is available to Smt. Sheetal and prayer for dismissal of petition sought.

3. Per contra Smt. Sheetal wife of Sh. Mahesh Thakur personally appeared before Court and submitted that matter has been compromised inter se parties out of Court and she is residing with her husband co-accused as of today and she has no objection if petition filed under Section 482 Cr.PC is allowed.

4. Court heard learned Advocate appearing on behalf of petitioners and learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of non-petitioner No.1 and Court also perused the entire records carefully.

5. Following points arise for determination in the present petition:

1) Whether petition filed under Section 482 Cr.PC is liable to be accepted as mentioned in memorandum of grounds of petition?

2) Final order.

Findings upon point No.1 with reasons:

6. It is proved on record that FIR No.176/2015 dated 14.05.2015 was filed by complainant namely Sheetal under Sections 498-A and 323 read with Section 34 IPC. It is also proved on record that investigation was completed and report of investigation under Section 173 Cr.PC was filed before competent Court of law. It is also proved on record that out of Court settlement executed inter se parties and complainant namely Sheetal is residing with her husband co-accused Mahesh Thakur as of today. It is well settled law that criminal offences which are against the society should not be allowed to be compounded by the Court. It is well settled law that following criminal offences should not be compounded while exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.PC. (i) Murder (ii) Rape (iii) Dacoity (iv) Prevention of Corruption Act (v) Criminal Offence under Section 307 IPC. It is well settled law that criminal offences relating to (i) Commercial transaction (ii) Matrimonial dispute and family dispute should be allowed to be compounded while exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.PC. See 2014(4) SC 573 Judgment Today title Narinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another. Present criminal proceedings are initiated against accused persons relating to matrimonial dispute. In view of the fact that complainant namely Sheetal is residing along with her husband co-accused Mahesh Thakur as of today Court is of the opinion that it is expedient in the ends of justice to allow the petition. In view of above stated facts out of Court settlement executed inter se parties is accepted by the Court. Point No.1 is answered in affirmative.

Point No.2 (Final Order).

7. In view of findings upon point No.1 above present petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 is allowed and out of Court settlement executed inter se parties is accepted by the Court and proceedings of Criminal Case No.76-2 of 2015 title State of H.P. v. Mahesh and others are quashed against accused persons in the ends of justice. Statement(s) of Sh. Mahesh Thakur and Smt. Sheetal recorded on 07.04.2016 will form part and parcel of the order.

8. Accused persons are discharged forthwith. File of learned Trial Court along with certified copy of the order be sent back forthwith. Cr.MMO No. 90/2016 is disposed of. Pending application(s) if any also disposed of.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More