F.S. Abdulqayum Vs Manindra Land and Building Corpn. Ltd. and Another

Allahabad High Court 16 Nov 1954 Ex. First Appeal No. 329 of 1954 (1954) 11 AHC CK 0009
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Ex. First Appeal No. 329 of 1954

Hon'ble Bench

Sahai, J; Agarwala, J

Advocates

V.K.S. Chaudhary, for the Appellant;

Final Decision

Dismissed

Acts Referred
  • Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) - Order 21 Rule 10, 100, 101
  • Companies Act, 1913 - Section 10, 11(4), 11(6)

Judgement Text

Translate:

Agarwala, J.@mdashThis is a judgment-debtor''s appeal arising out of execution proceedings. A suit was filed by Manindra Banking Corporation, Ltd., and it was decreed in that name. During the pendency of the suit, however, Manindra Banking Corporation Ltd., changed its name to Manindra Land and Building Corporation, Ltd. A certificate incorporating the company in the altered name was granted to the company.

After the decree, the Company wanted to file an application for execution of the decree by stating its name as "Manindra Banking Corporation, Ltd., now known as Manindra Land and Building Corporation, Ltd." The judgment-debtor raised an objection that since the decree was not passed in the new name, the Company could not execute the same. This objection was overruled and execution was allowed to proceed by the court below. Against that order the judgment-debtor has come up in appeal to this Court.

2. Two points have been raised before us. The first point was the same as was raised in the court below, namely, that the new name not having been entered in the decree, execution could not be carried out in the new name. This objection has no substance. Sub-section (6) of Section 11, Companies Act states:

Section 11. "(6) The change of name shall not affect any rights or obligations of the company, or render defective any legal proceedings by or against the company, and any legal proceedings that might have been continued or commenced against it by its former name may be continued or commenced against it by its new name."

The change of name does not, therefore, affect the rights of the Company. The decree in its former name can be executed in the new name which has already been incorporated.

3. The second point raised was that the Company did not obtain the approval of the Central Government to change its name as provided by Sub-section (4) of Section 11, Companies Act. This is a question of fact and it was not raised in the court below as there is no mention of it in the judgment. Learned counsel is unable to say whether in fact the approval of the Central Government was or was not obtained, but in the circum stances we ca(sic) this objection to be raised at this stage.

4. There is no force (sic) this appeal and we dismiss it under Order 41, Rule Civil P. C.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More