Virendra Nath Shukla, Institute Of Education & Technology & Vs State of U.P.Thru Prin.Secy.Higher Education & Ors

Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) 4 Jun 2009 (2009) 06 AHC CK 0029
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Rajiv Sharma, J and Satish Chandra, J

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

Dr. Satish Chandra, J.

Supplementary affidavit filed today by the petitioner is taken on record.

The submission of the petitioner is that the fee for B.Ed. Course has been fixed by the Government but the petitioner wants to enhance the fee due to high cost. Writ Petition No. 618 of 2009 (M/B) is already pending before this Court to this effect. For charging higher fee, the District Administration is interfering in the daytoday affair of the institution.

The respondents submitted that a Committee is likely to be constituted for this purpose and the petitioner cannot charge the extra fee as per the Govt. Orders dated 24.1.2008 and 27.6.2008.

However, learned counsel for the respondents have not been able to indicate any provision or authority where the District Administration can interfere in such matters, therefore, we further direct that the District Authorities shall not interfere in the functioning of the Institute/College, till further orders.

List this petition along with Writ Petition No. 618 of 2009 (M/B).

From The Blog
ITAT Mumbai Says Stock Write-Down Cannot Be Disallowed Without Evidence, Remands Case for Fresh Hearing
Nov
22
2025

Court News

ITAT Mumbai Says Stock Write-Down Cannot Be Disallowed Without Evidence, Remands Case for Fresh Hearing
Read More
Bombay High Court Rules Arbitrators Lose Mandate If Proceedings Are Suspended Over Fee Disputes
Nov
22
2025

Court News

Bombay High Court Rules Arbitrators Lose Mandate If Proceedings Are Suspended Over Fee Disputes
Read More