Mookherjee, Biswas And Pathak & Ors Vs Kanchan Dutta & Ors

Calcutta High Court 26 Nov 2018 Arbitration Petition No.797 Of 2018 (2018) 11 CAL CK 0038
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Arbitration Petition No.797 Of 2018

Hon'ble Bench

Ashis Kumar Chakraborty, J

Advocates

Jishnu Saha, Hashnuhana Chakraborty, Jaydip Kar, Siddhartha Ghosh, S.K. Mukherjee, Debdeep Sinha

Final Decision

Disposed Off

Acts Referred
  • Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34, 36(3)

Judgement Text

Translate:

The Court : In this application under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, as amended by Act No.3 of 2016 (in short, ""the Act of

1996"") the petitioners being the partnership firm and partners have challenged the consolidated award dated August 13, 2018 passed by the sole

Arbitrator. It appears that there is a day’s delay of filing the present application beyond the period of 90 days from the date of receipt of the

arbitral award. Accordingly, the application for setting aside of the impugned award is admitted.

By the impugned award the Arbitrator has directed the present petitioners to pay Rs.22,69,050/-, Rs.11,84,077/- and Rs.10,84,047/- to the respondent

nos.1, 2 and 3 respectively, the retired partners of the petitioner no.1 firm together with interest thereon at the rate of 12%, per annum and the

petitioners have prayed for stay of operation of the arbitral award.

As per the impugned award the total amount payable by the petitioners to the respondents is Rs.45,37,174/- together with interest at the rate of 12 per

cent per annum.

It appears that the claims of the present respondents, the claimants in the arbitral proceeding arose on account of their dues after retiring from the

petitioner no.1 firm and the Arbitrator has directed the petitioners, to pay the aforementioned amounts to the respective respondents as their

outstanding dues from the partnership firm.

In view of the Proviso to Sub-section(3) of Section 36 of the Act of 1996, in order to obtain stay of operation of the money award made by the

Arbitrator, the petitioner is required either to deposit the entire awarded amount or to secure the same before this Court.

Accordingly, subject to deposit of Rs.45,37,174/- with the learned Registrar, Original Side of this Court within December 14, 2018, the impugned

award dated August 13, 2018 shall remain stayed till the disposal of this application. There shall be an unconditional stay of operation of the arbitral

award till December 17, 2018.

In the event of any failure on the part of the petitioners to deposit the said amount of Rs.45,37,174/- within the time stipulated above, the respondents

shall be free to execute the impugned arbitral award, without any further reference to this Court.

Subject to furnishing bank guarantee to the satisfaction of the learned Registrar Original Side of this Court, each of the respondents would be entitled

to withdraw the respective amounts directed by the Arbitrator to be paid by each of them. Needless to mention that the respondents shall continue to

renew their bank guarantees in favour of the Registrar, Original Side of this Court untill disposal of this application.

Let this application appear in the list, under the heading “For Hearingâ€, in the monthly list of February, 2019. The appeal will be heard on the basis

of the documents already disclosed in this application.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More