Shankar Lal Vs State Of Rajasthan And Others

Rajasthan High Court 10 Jan 2024 Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14034 Of 2023 (2024) 01 RAJ CK 0047
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14034 Of 2023

Hon'ble Bench

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

Advocates

Pradeep Shah, Geeta Panpaliya, SK Bhati

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 438
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 120B, 419, 420

Judgement Text

Translate:

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.441/2023 lodged at Police Station Kotwali Barmer, for the offence under Sections 419, 420 & 120-B of IPC.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that main accused Joga Ram has been arrested and he has already been enlarged on regular bail and the present petitioner was merely present on the place of incident. Moreover, no specific role has been assigned against the present petitioner. In such circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner behind the bars for indefinite time. Thus, the petitioner may be released on anticipatory bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Shankar Lal S/o Sh. Bhika Ram in connection with FIR No.441/2023 lodged at Police StationKotwali Barmer, the petitioner shall be released on bail; provided he furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More