M.C. Agarwal, J.@mdashThese two revision petitions by the Commissioner of Trade Tax are directed against an order dated November 11,
1994 passed by the Trade Tax Tribunal, Moradabad, whereby it allowed the dealer''s appeals in respect of its assessment under the Central Sales
Tax Act, 1956 and U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 for assessment year 1993-94.
2. I have heard Sri Surya Prakash, learned Standing Counsel for the Commissioner and Sri Piyush Agrawal, learned counsel for the respondent.
3. The dealer-respondent is a merchant of gur. The question is whether the purchases of gur were made by it on its own behalf or they were made
as commission agent acting for ex-U.P. principals. The assessing officer held that the purchases were in the dealer''s own account and the despatch
of those goods subsequently to ex-U.P. businessmen were by way of inter-State sales. This finding was upheld by the first appellate authority. The
dealer appealed to the Tribunal which has reversed the finding and held that the purchases were made on behalf of ex-U.P. principals and,
therefore, the purchases being in the course of inter-State trade and commerce, were not taxable under the U.P. Trade Tax Act and there were no
inter-State sales of the goods. This is a pure finding of fact. I have been taken through the Tribunal''s order and no illegality requiring interference in
revisional jurisdiction u/s 11 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 is made out.
4. The revision petitions are dismissed.
