Krishna Madho Sharma and Others Vs State of U.P., and Others

Allahabad High Court 11 Mar 1997 C.M.W.P. No''s. 12137 and 15062 of 1991
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

C.M.W.P. No''s. 12137 and 15062 of 1991

Hon'ble Bench

S.L. Saraf, J

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

S.L. Saraf, J.@mdashHeard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned standing Counsel for the Respondent.

2. This mailer relates to the retrenchment of 21 employees who were working in the Press run by the Bar Association, High Court, Allahabad.

Sometimes on 4th July, 1988 the printing work of the cause list by the Bar Association stopped and the High Court cause list was printed

subsequently by the Government Press, Allahabad. However, that resulted the services of 21 employees of the Bar Association redundant as no

work of the cause list was available any more.

3. The question involved is relating to the employment of these 21 persons. In the facts of this case, though the said employees were not the

Government employees, still they were doing the work of the High Court in the capacity as employee of the Bar Association. It appears from the

documents annexed to the petition that the then Hon''ble Chief Justice has also taken on their cause with the Judicial Secretary/Legal

Remembrancer of the Government of Uttar Pradesh requesting the authorities to consider the case of these persons who were employed by the

Bar Association previously and to absorb them in appropriate Job of similar nature. However, over a period of six years nothing appears to have

been done. The Government though have shown engerness to offer employment to them, have done nothing.

4. In the facts of this case, I feel that it is the obligation and duty of the State Government to take sympathetic view in this matter and provide them

employment of the similar nature. I direct the authorities to take steps in giving them appropriate employment within a period of six months and

absorb them with a job of similar nature.

5. With these observations, this petition is accordingly disposed of.

let a copy of this order may be given to the learned Counsel for the parties on payment of usual charges within three days.

From The Blog
Moti Ram Deka & Ors vs General Manager, N.E.F. Railways & Ors (1963)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

Moti Ram Deka & Ors vs General Manager, N.E.F. Railways & Ors (1963)
Read More
M/s. Orissa Cement Ltd. & Others vs State of Orissa & Others (1991)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

M/s. Orissa Cement Ltd. & Others vs State of Orissa & Others (1991)
Read More