Ram Ashray Singh and Others Vs State of U.P. and Others

Allahabad High Court 27 Feb 2003 C.M.W.P. No. 32383 of 2001 (2003) 5 AWC 3771
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

C.M.W.P. No. 32383 of 2001

Hon'ble Bench

Prakash Krishna, J; M. Katju, J

Advocates

Mangala Prasad Rai and Ashok Kumar Rai, for the Appellant;

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred

Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

M. Katju, J.@mdashThree weeks and no more further time is granted to learned standing counsel to the file counter-affidavit.

List immediately thereafter.

It is made clear that no further time will be granted.

2. It has come to our notice in many cases that despite stop orders passed by this Court, counter-affidavits are not filed. This is very unfortunate

and in fact it goes against the interest of the Government or the Respondent authority, as the writ petition will have to be decided on an ex parte

version. We direct that whenever stop orders are passed by this Court , it must immediately be communicated by learned standing counsel to the

Law Secretary of the U.P. Government, apart from communicating it to the authority concerned, and it will be the duty of the Law Secretary to see

to it that counter-affidavit is filed in such cases otherwise the interest of the State or the authority concerned will suffer.

3. The learned standing counsel is directed to send a copy of this order forthwith to the Law Secretary, U. P., the learned Advocate General, U.P.

and Chief Standing Counsels both at Lucknow and Allahabad as well as the senior standing counsel of the Central Government.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Rejects NALSA Appeal Filed Sans Convict Consent
Oct
30
2025

Story

Supreme Court Rejects NALSA Appeal Filed Sans Convict Consent
Read More
Supreme Court Raps Insurers for Technical Appeals in Claims
Oct
30
2025

Story

Supreme Court Raps Insurers for Technical Appeals in Claims
Read More