Ram Pravesh Sahni Vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court 5 Jun 2020 Criminal Miscellaneous No. 14173 Of 202 (2020) 06 PAT CK 0035
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 14173 Of 202

Hon'ble Bench

Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J

Advocates

Dr. Alok Kumar Alok, Nitya Nand Tiwary

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 395
  • Arms Act, 1959 - Section 27

Judgement Text

Translate:

Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J

1. The matter has been heard via video conferencing due to lockdown imposed on account of the COVID-19 pandemic.

2. Heard Dr. Alok Kumar Alok, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter

referred to as the ‘APP’) for the State.

3. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Nanpur PS Case No. 468 of 2019 dated 19.12.2019 instituted under Sections 395 of the Indian Penal

Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

4. The allegation against the petitioner is that he was party to looting of articles from the houses of many villagers.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR is against 35-40 unknown persons and the allegation is that the criminals were armed and

when the villagers had come, bomb was also exploded. Learned counsel submitted that he is innocent and has been named only because it is alleged

that from one of the co-accused, who was caught and from whom some article was recovered, it was found that the petitioner was on talking terms

with that of co-accused. It was submitted that there has been no recovery from the petitioner and that he has no other criminal antecedent and is in

custody since 12.01.2020.

6. Learned APP submitted that the petitioner was on talking terms with one of the co-accused from whom there has been recovery of one looted SIM

Card.

7. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail

upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM,

Pupari, Sitamarhi in Nanpur PS Case No. 468 of 2019, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner, (ii)

that the petitioner and the bailors shall execute bond with regard to good behaviour of the petitioner, and (iii) that the petitioner shall also give an

undertaking to the Court that he shall not indulge in any criminal activity. Any violation of the terms and conditions of the bonds or the undertaking

shall lead to cancellation of his bail bonds. The petitioner shall cooperate in the case and be present before the Court on each and every date. Failure

to cooperate or being absent on two consecutive dates, without sufficient cause, shall also lead to cancellation of his bail bonds.

8. The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More