Indrajit Kumar Vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court 21 Jul 2020 Criminal Miscellaneous No. 22035 Of 2020 (2020) 07 PAT CK 0313
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 22035 Of 2020

Hon'ble Bench

Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J

Advocates

Mahendra Thakur, Bhanu Pratap Singh

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred
  • Bihar Prohibition And Excise Act, 2016 - Section 30(a)

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. The matter has been heard via video conferencing due to circumstances prevailing on account of the COVID-19 pandemic.

2. Heard Mr. Mahendra Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter

referred to as the ‘APP’) for the State.

3. The petitioner is in custody in connection with C2/146 of 2020 dated 26.02.2020, instituted under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise

Act, 2016.

4. The allegation against the petitioner is that he was caught with 63 litres of Nepali sofi wine.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has been falsely implicated and there was no recovery from the possession of the petitioner. It

was further submitted that the seizure has also not been made in accordance with law. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner having no other

criminal antecedent is in custody since 26.02.2020.

6. Learned APP submitted that the petitioner was carrying 63 litres of illicit Nepali liquor which has been seized.

7. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail

upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J.-II-

cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Sitamarhi in C2/146 of 2020, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the

petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner and the bailors shall execute bond with regard to good behaviour of the petitioner, and (iii) that the petitioner shall also

give an undertaking to the Court that he shall not indulge in any criminal activity, tamper with the evidence or influence the witnesses. Any violation of

the terms and conditions of the bonds or the undertaking shall lead to cancellation of his bail bonds. The petitioner shall cooperate in the case and be

present before the Court on each and every date. Failure to cooperate or being absent on two consecutive dates, without sufficient cause, shall also

lead to cancellation of his bail bonds.

8. The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More