Satish Chandra Rastogi Vs State of U.P. and others

Allahabad High Court 20 May 2011 C.M.W.P. No. 29506 of 2011 (2011) 05 AHC CK 0385
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

C.M.W.P. No. 29506 of 2011

Hon'ble Bench

Satya Poot Mehrotra, J; Jayashree Tiwari, J

Final Decision

Dismissed

Acts Referred
  • Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI) - Section 13(2)

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

Satya Poot Mehrotra and Mrs. Jayashree Tiwari, JJ.@mdashThe present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, inter alia, praying for giving a direction to the respondents not to take any coercive action/measure against the petitioner, and further directing to fix easy instalments and furnish statement of account to the petitioner.

2. It appears that the petitioner took housing loan from the respondent No. 3 I.C.I.C.I. Bank Ltd. The petitioner committed default in payment of the loan. Consequently, proceedings u/s 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short "the Securitisation Act") have been initiated against the petitioner. A notice u/s 13(2) of the Securitisation Act was issued to the petitioner by the respondent No. 4 claiming itself to be the assignee from the respondent No. 3 in respect of the said loan. The copy of the said notice u/s 13(2) of the Securitisation Act has been filed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition.

3. Shri Manish Trivedi, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 submits that the petitioner had earlier filed a writ petition, being Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 45523 of 2010, impugning the measure taken against the petitioner by the respondent No. 4 herein pursuant to the said notice u/s 13(2) of the Securitisation Act. Shri Manish Trivedi further submits that the said writ petition was disposed of by this Court by the order dated 4.8.2010 giving various directions, and thus, the present writ petition filed by the petitioner is second writ petition in regard to the same cause of action. Shri Manish Trivedi has produced before the Court a photostat copy of the certified copy of the order dated 4.8.2010, which is taken on record.

4. In view of the above, it is evident that the present writ petition filed by the petitioner is the second writ petition in regard to the same cause of action. The present writ petition is thus not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed.

The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Orders Immediate Release of Delhi Lawyer Arrested in Haryana Murder Case
Nov
14
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Orders Immediate Release of Delhi Lawyer Arrested in Haryana Murder Case
Read More
Supreme Court Calls for Public Disclosure of High Court Judges’ Timely Judgment Records
Nov
14
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Calls for Public Disclosure of High Court Judges’ Timely Judgment Records
Read More