Shailesh @ Savji Vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Indore Bench) 30 Dec 2021 Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.64477 Of 2021 (2021) 12 MP CK 0094
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.64477 Of 2021

Hon'ble Bench

Rajendra Kumar Verma, J

Advocates

Nilesh Dave, Viraj Godha

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred
  • Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 437(3), 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 363, 366, 376
  • Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Section 5, 6
  • Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(2)(V)

Judgement Text

Translate:

Rajendra Kumar Verma, J

This is first application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of bail in connection with Crime No.

265/2018 registered at Police Station â€" Raipuriya, District -Jhabua for the offence registered under Sections s 363, 366, 376 of IPC and sections 5/6

of POCSO Act and sections 3(2)(V) of SC & ST ( Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The applicant is in custody since 18/08/2019

As per prosecution story, the allegation against the present applicant, he abducted and committed rape upon the prosecutrix, hence the aforementioned

offences have been registered and he has been arrested.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present crime. He has no criminal

antecedents. Investigation is over and chargesheet has been filed. The applicant is in custody since 18/08/2019. The prosecutrix and father of the

prosecutrix were examined on 13/07/2021 and they have turned hostile and not supported the prosecution story and conclusion of trial will take

sufficient long time. In these circumstances the applicant be released on bail.

The prayer is opposed by learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent / State.

Taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties as also the fact that

the prosecutrix has turned hostile and not supported the prosecution case; investigation is over and chargesheet has been filed and the applicant is in

custody since 18/08/2019., however without commenting on merits, I deem it proper to enlarge the applicant on bail.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. The applicant is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-

(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before the trial Court

concerned as and when directed.

He shall abide by the conditions enumerated under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C..

The applicant will attend each hearing of his trial before the trial Court out of which this bail arises. Any default in the attendance in Court would

result in cancellation of the bail granted by this Court. With the aforesaid, the application stands disposed of.

Certified copy, as per Rules.

From The Blog
Delhi High Court Grants Default Bail: Extension of NDPS Investigation Without Notice Violates Article 21
Dec
15
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Grants Default Bail: Extension of NDPS Investigation Without Notice Violates Article 21
Read More
Madras High Court: Honour Killing Still Plagues Society, Bail Must Be Rare in Grave Offences
Dec
15
2025

Court News

Madras High Court: Honour Killing Still Plagues Society, Bail Must Be Rare in Grave Offences
Read More