Rakesh Vs Vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Indore Bench) 1 May 2023 Criminal Appeal No. 5968 Of 2023 (2023) 05 MP CK 0001
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Appeal No. 5968 Of 2023

Hon'ble Bench

Anil Verma, J

Advocates

Omprakash Solank, Kapil Mahant

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 389(1)
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 332
  • Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va)

Judgement Text

Translate:

Anil Verma, J

Heard on I.A.No.6221/2023, which is first application under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail and suspension of remaining jail sentence on behalf of the appellant Rakesh S/o Udan Singh Thakur.

Appellant stands convicted vide judgment dated 18/04/2023 passed in SC ATR 111/2018 by Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Dhar, District Dhar (M.P.) under Sections 332 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3(1)(s) and 3(2) (va) of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and has been sentenced to undergo 02 years RI with fine of Rs.1,500/-, 01 year RI with fine of Rs.1,000/- and 02 years RI with fine of Rs.1,500/-respectively with usual default stipulation.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this matter. During the trial appellant was on bail and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. His jail sentence has also been suspended by the Trial Court till 10/07/2023. There are material contradictions and omissions in the statement of the witnesses. Looking to old pendency of the cases for consideration, final conclusion of this appeal would take sufficient long time. There is a strong case in favour of the appellant. Hence, the execution of the remaining part of the jail sentence of the appellant be suspended till the final disposal of this appeal.

Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent / State opposes the application for suspension of sentence and prays for its rejection.

Considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of the allegation levelled against the appellant and also taking note of the fact that appellant was on bail during the trial; there is no complaint that he has misused the liberty granted to him and final conclusion of the appeal will also take sufficient long time. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it proper to suspend the remaining custodial sentence of the appellant.

Accordingly, I.A.No.6221/2023 is allowed and it is directed subject to deposit of fine amount, if not already deposited, and subject to furnishing personal bond by the appellant in the sum of Rs.75,000/- (Rupees Seventy Five Thousand Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court, the execution of remaining custodial part of the sentence of the appellant shall remain suspended, till final disposal of this appeal.

The appellant after being enlarged on bail shall mark his presence before the Registry of this Court on 23/11/2023 and on all such subsequent dates, which are fixed in this behalf.

Let record of the trial Court be requisitioned.

Certified copy as per rules.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More