Dharmendra Das Vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Indore Bench) 3 Apr 2024 Criminal Appeal No. 4279 Of 2024 (2024) 04 MP CK 0023
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Appeal No. 4279 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

Prem Narayan Singh, J

Advocates

Jayesh Yadav, Sachin Jaiswal

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 389
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 354(A)(1)(i), 354(D)(1)(i)
  • Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(I)(W)(ii) , 3(2)(va)

Judgement Text

Translate:

Prem Narayan Singh, J

1. Heard on the question of admission.

2. The appeal appears to be arguable, hence, admitted for final hearing.

3. Heard on I.A. No.5388/2024, which is an application filed under Section 389 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 for suspension of sentence on

behalf of appellant.

4. The appellant has been convicted for short sentence under Section 354(A)(1)(i), 354(D)(1)(i) of IPC and Sections 3(I)(W)(ii) and 3(2)(va) of

SC/ST Act and sentenced to undergo 01-01 year R.I with fine for each offence and with default stipulations.

5 . Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is innocent and has falsely been implicated. The jail sentence of the appellant has

already been suspended by the learned trial Court itself. He further submitted that final hearing of this appeal is likely to take sufficient long time.

Under these circumstances, looking to the short sentence, learned counsel prays that the application for suspension of sentence of the appellant be

allowed.

6. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer and prayed for dismissal of the application for suspension of sentence.

7. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, contention of learned counsel for the appellant, the short sentence of the appellant and the fact

that the trial Court has already suspended the jail sentence of the appellant, without commenting on the merits of the case, the application is allowed.

8. It is directed that subject to depositing the fine amount, if already not deposited, the appellant shall be released on bail, on furnishing a personal bond

in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Trial Court, for his appearance

before the Registry of this Court firstly on 25.04.2024 and on such other dates, as may be fixed by the Registry in this regard, till final disposal of this

appeal.

9. Accordingly, application stands allowed and disposed of.

10. Record of the Court below be called for.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Cracks Down on Digital Arrest Scams Using Forged Court Documents
Nov
24
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Cracks Down on Digital Arrest Scams Using Forged Court Documents
Read More
Supreme Court Sends Officer’s Choice vs Original Choice Trademark Battle to Mediation
Nov
24
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Sends Officer’s Choice vs Original Choice Trademark Battle to Mediation
Read More