@JUDGEMENTTAG- JUDGEMENT
Rohit Arya, J
1. Heard on I.A. No. 6185 of 2024, an application under section 378(3) of Cr.P.C. for grant o f leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal of respondent dated 8-1-2024 passed by 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Shivpuri, District - Shivpuri whereby respondent has been acquitted of charges levelled against him under Sections 376 and 506 of the I.P.C.
2. We have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of State. We have also-04-2024perused the impugned judgment.
3 . The conclusion of acquittal drawn in favour of the respondent particularly, in view of paragraphs No.9, 16 and 21 of the impugned judgment, appears to be reasonable and plausible based on proper appreciation of evidence. The judgment and the reasoning thereof, are not manifestly illegal or perverse to make out a case of miscarriage of justice. The judgment is impregnable as neither there is any illegality nor irregularity in the finding so recorded. Therefore, no compelling or substantial reasons for interference by this appellate Court and for grant of leave to appeal, are made out.
4. Accordingly, the I.A. No. 6185 of 2024 is rejected.
5. Consequently, present appeal stands dismissed.
