Archana Raina Vs Union Territory Of J&K And Others

Jammu And Kashmir High Court 29 Jul 2020 Writ Petition (C) No. 1188 Of 2020, Civil Miscellaneous No. 3476, 3477 Of 2020 (2020) 07 J&K CK 0007
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (C) No. 1188 Of 2020, Civil Miscellaneous No. 3476, 3477 Of 2020

Hon'ble Bench

Ali Mohammad Magrey, J; Vinod Chatterji Koul, J

Advocates

M. K. Sharma

Final Decision

Disposed Off

Judgement Text

Translate:

Ali Mohammad Magrey, J

This petition is directed against the order dated 22nd of June, 2020, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu Bench (hereinafter referred

to as “the Tribunalâ€​) in OA No.61/00046/2020, whereby the Tribunal has declined to pass the interim relief in favour of the petitioner.

At the outset, we are not going into the merits of the case of the petitioner/ grounds projected in the Writ petition qua challenge to the aforesaid order

passed by the Tribunal solely because mere declining of interim relief by the Tribunal does not give any right to the petitioner to approach this Court

with a Writ petition. The Tribunal is seized of the matter and the rights of the parties are to be determined there on the basis of the pleadings on record

as well as after hearing the counsel for the parties.

Apprised of and faced with the above situation, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall feel satisfied in the event the

instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-Government to consider his claim as espoused in the representation stated to be

pending before the respondent-Government within a reasonable timeframe.

In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned authority

in the respondent-Government to consider the claim of the petitioner as detailed out in the representation, stated to have been filed and pending before

the respondent-Government, within a period of two weeks from today. The petitioner shall also be at liberty to file a fresh representation before the

concerned authority in the respondent-Government with regard to his claim within one week from today and, in the event any such representation is

filed, same shall be considered and decided by the respondent-Government within two weeks thereafter, of course, in accordance with the law and the

rules governing the field. It is, however, made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the case and that same

shall be decided by the Tribunal after hearing the counsel for the parties.

Writ petition disposed of as above, alongwith the connected CM(s).

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More